|
Dear Sir/Madam,
I would just like to add to those comments made recently about lighting in Swanton Abbott.
Street lighting in any rural village is totally inappropriate. What I find disturbing is the number of people who still believe that street lighting reduces crime and increases security. The truth of the matter is that it doesn’t. Most crime occurs in daylight ergo criminals need light. Add street lighting and one will find it will encourage people to behave at night more as they would during the day. Consequently the rate of crime will go up. Those areas with the highest crime rates are also the most intensively illuminated. It has been seen that during power cuts criminality goes down almost to zero. This was demonstrated recently in Auckland, New Zealand, and I have experienced it myself in Dhaka, Bangladesh, where at least two power failures occur every night. If I was a resident of Swanton Abbot, I would definitely feel more secure under a blanket of darkness.
Lighting is also very damaging to the environment, being responsible for killing insects that lie near the base of the food chain. The decline of our common species of amphibians, reptiles, birds, and small mammals correlates inversely with the expansion of street and security lighting over the past fifty years. If we value our wildlife and rural areas then we need to campaign for a reduction in lighting, not an increase.
"If some people have a problem with darkness in an isolated rural village then maybe they’d be better off living in a city centre. Introducing lighting into a rural village will destroy the natural distinction that currently exists between town and country."
Yours sincerely,
Colin Henshaw.
|